Sunday, June 24, 2012

Jerry Sandusky and his Adopted Son

Jerry Sandusky is guilty, will likely spend the rest of his life behind bars.

Only a few days ago Sandusky's wife, Dorothy (Dottie) testified that she heard nothing, saw no reason to believe that her mate had been having sex with children in her basement. She apparently knew not to go down to do the laundry.

She's the interesting patient, to me, as an example of dysfunctional loyalty.  Families are so powerful.  It can't be easy being Mrs. Sandusky, never was, that's for sure.  This had to have been her worst nightmare.



It's amazing that some families stick together, though, even as it becomes apparent that a member has done something monstrous, appalling. Regarding Sandusky, even the word evil appliesaccording to Shana Stamm (27), a young woman who remembers hearing his motivational speeches at her elementary school as a child.

He was there to raise money for his charity, The Second Mile. Sandusky set up the children's charity, now we have to assume, to choose from any number of vulnerable, disadvantaged youngsters. A pedophile's dream.  He adopted six of them.

He is guilty of 45 counts of sexual abuse. Eight victims testified against him, none of them his adopted sons.  They told stories like Mr. Weaver's:
Travis Weaver . .(is) suing Jerry Sandusky, (and) told NBC's "Rock Center with Brian Williams" that Sandusky abused him more than 100 times over four years starting in 1992, when he was 10.
Story, after story, after story, after story, after story.  All while one of Sandusky's adopted sons, Matt, looked on at the trial as if he were his father's loyal supporter.

And then:
after a week of tearful, gruesome accounts by eight men that they had been abused as boys by Jerry Sandusky, the former football assistant coach at Penn State, Matt Sandusky . . . offered to testify that he himself had been abused by his father. . .
Matt's biological mother, Debra Long, has come forward to say that she suspected, many years ago, that something was wrong in the Sandusky home, that Matt might be in trouble. Her reports to authorities fell on deaf ears.  She regrets not pushing it, thinks she may have spared her son and subsequent victims so much pain.

Perhaps Jerry Sandusky could have been stopped, even put behind bars, back then.

To bring the story home:

A young woman recently tells me that she is getting a new job.

She has a school teaching transfer from a school in a good neighborhood, with a difficult administration, to a school in a bad neighborhood, with a friendlier administration. She's excited about the change, but worried that she will see many young victims of child abuse.

That goes with the territory, working with kids, but she's afraid to report (teachers are mandated reporters).  She's afraid of the repercussions, revenge at the hands of angry, psychopathic (or almost psychopathic) parents who are likely to get that knock on the door from protective services.

Oh, I remember making those calls, I say, reminiscing, seeing leg bruises the size of baseball bats because they were inflicted by baseball bats.  And that was in a nice, middle-class neighborhood.

I tell her that (a) the statistics on child abuse cross class lines, although there is likely to be more street violence where she's going;

(b) her calls to the Department of Child and Family Services could save lives;

and (c) as we've all come to find in the case of Jerry Sandusky, child sexual abuse and pedophilia are everywhere, neighborhood doesn't matter.  You can take little boys out of their disadvantaged neighborhoods and make them victims of predators who work in America's very best schools.

She'll tell, I'm sure, when she has her suspicions.  She'll make those calls or have her principal make them for her.  And my guess is that the social worker from her state's protective services department will be listening, and wondering: Is the family covering for a terrible perpetrator?  Is there more here than meets the eye?  And maybe, just because of Sandusky, the team will do a very thorough investigation, complete with follow up.

Something positive has to come out of this.

therapydoc

10 comments:

Laura said...

I'd love to hear more of your thoughts about Mrs Sandusky.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, me too. It's something I have always wondered about. And it's personal in my case.

therapydoc said...

Sure, but with so little information, it's all conjecture. Anyone else care to try first?

vicariousrising said...

I think this is why I feel betrayed by my father, who not only enabled my mother's behavior but pushed me to sacrifice myself for her whims as well.

The feeling is that I was cheated by getting a crappy mother, but I was abandoned by my father. He was the one making terrible choices. I'm not sure my mother had many choices to make given her deep narcissism.

Good post. Thank you.

Anonymous said...

OK. I suppose it is difficult for her to admit even to herself that it was going on because of what it meant about her, about her choices, and mainly about what she would have to do about it. What she would have to give up. And of course, who knows what her background includes. Unlikely in my experience that whole people find and attach themselves to broken people.

Tundra Woman said...

Great post. Thanks for mentioning "neighborhood doesn't matter." I grew up in a very affluent home and unfortunately in the '50's and '60's no one would believe the abuse that occurred behind the doors of "THOSE homes."
Wanna bet?
TW

therapydoc said...

Thanks, there's so much to talk about on this one. And we will. I'm thinking quick and dirty, however, that it's about not wanting the sole support in jail. Selfish? Sure. But there's more to it, attachment, love, shame, and all that you've all said.
Not sure how to do the html, but here's a link about that.
http://tinyurl.com/892qhr5

porcini66 said...

I also think that it is the very essence of denial. Something so incredibly taboo, in almost every society, must stay hidden. Sure, it's a reflection on her! But more than that, it's the absolute disgust and shame that she felt when even contemplating the possibility that it *might* be happening. Oh, no...it's just so much easier to tuck those little thoughts way down deep and not think about them...

I feel a tremendous amount of pity for her, as well as anger. Yes, she could have (should have) done something. But that would have meant thinking about "it" or, God forbid, DEALING with it and "it" is a horrible, horrible thing to think about.

I know first hand how awful it is. As a victim, I didn't know what to do with my own thoughts and feelings for years and years, so just pushed them away, pretended they didn't exist...I imagine that she did exactly the same thing.

Jodi Underhill,MEd.,LMHC said...

Dynamic blog entry. So many failed these victims. I have in my years of practice discovered many overzealous foster care workers who want to have another "adoption" on their record...don't consider the damage of not checking out the homes these kids are placed in.

Jodi H. Underhill, LMHC

The Writing Goddess said...

I've had several friends confide in me about sexual abuse in their family of origin. The scariest (and most hurtful) thing is how the family closes ranks around the ABUSER, not the victim.

You can make the argument that the abuser is sick and can't help him or herself. But what about everybody else?

I have a friend whose husband had 3 kids with his ex wife. When their daughter was 8-9 years old, she was violently beaten and raped by her stepfather. Stepfather was convicted and went to jail for several years. The girl's mother didn't deny what he did (too much physical evidence) but she visited the guy in jail, and welcomed him home when he got out. She forgave him, because after all he said he was sorry, and "that's the Christian thing to do." *gagging*

My friend basically became the girl's mother - they got custody, right after they rape, and spent many years in family counseling together. But even though the girl formed a strong bond with her new stepmom, the betrayal by her mother still hurts, probably always will.