Statcounter

Showing posts with label apologizing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label apologizing. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 20, 2021

Apologizing

 It seems so easy to me, apologizing, or taking something back that I shouldn't have said. That sense of my bad is so jarring, so upsetting. There's baggage to it, triggers (if something feels bad it is because something else is at work). Someone is mad at me, someone doesn't like me. So to get rid of the baggage someone like me will be quick to own responsibility for messing up. It feels easy, like removing a finger from a hot burner on the stove. 

That's when we're aware. We're all like this to some degree. When we know, when we're aware of the feelings of others and that they will ricochet back to hurt us, we're motivated to reverse the damage. We'll say, I'm sorry.

But as the good doctor/rabbi Peter Rosenzweig likes to say, about 99% of what is happening around us isn't available to us, it's unconscious. 

Or maybe it was 95%.  You get the idea. 

The interesting thing about the subject of apologies is that we know there are people who cannot do it, cannot bring themselves to apologize, which makes doing couple therapy a bit of a challenge. Why? For some it feels like others should be apologizing to them, should be working harder to understand them, to feel their pain. Owning responsibility is exactly what some of us want others to do for us-- feel our pain. If only you would only empathize with me, you'd get it! You first. 

When I notice that going on (and it is sometimes even spoken) in therapy I might say:

(Name of pt). You have lived without that understanding this long, live without it a little longer just for today's visit. Let's get you into the position of modeling the behavior for your partner. One way to do that is to apologize first, say you are aware that you might have hurt her (him) and that you are sorry. See if it doesn't come back to you in a good way. 

We would call that secondary gain, There's just something about saying, I did that. It ends up feeling okay-- you aren't punished-- crazy, I know. You feel like there will be some kind of punishment, but there is not

This process is psycho-educational, and for some, it works. If therapists can help partners feel the pain of one another they are half-way there. 

We could call that an intervention, labeling the pain of the one who can't apologize. But it will not always work. There are other interventions, and we'll get to them in a second, but I'm wondering about the corollary of my first paragraph. Does what I wrote mean that people who don't take responsibility and/or don't apologize are not worried about social rejection? Does it mean that pride, a type of blinder, shields all of us from social rejection? As if  I'm right, so you must be wrong, nothing in-between. No need to apologize.

What's a therapist to do? Here are a few more thoughts, interventions:

(1) Chip away at the pride, or insecure narcissism-- that might be one option--The therapist says: Well what if you aren't correct? I think it would be helpful here, in the interest of empathizing and improving your relationship, for you to try on the idea of What if I'm not right? What happens then? 

This isa favorite intervention, although they're all good, because it forces people to face that catastrophic expectation, the consequences of being wrong, which in most situations are anything but catastrophic, and in fact, are benign.

(2) The therapist asks the partner to ask the other partner to do that-- that's good except that he or she has probably done it before without success, and that's the response I tend to get back

(3) The therapist explores the idea that they are both right and it is their challenge to find out how that could be true

(4) The therapist switches from content to feelings, simply do an emotional check-up-- how upset are you, and how upset are you, and what's weighing in on those feelings

(5) The therapist asks them who else they know who agrees with them and have they been talking about this topic with other people, and could that be affecting how strongly they are attached to being right or wrong

(6) The therapist asks, "In the past, how important was it for a parent or sibling to be right?"

(7) The therapist asks, "Has substance abuse made you feel either (a) always wrong, or (b) always right-- because according to the program. . . the program teaches. . . "

Not a complete list, for sure. But it's a start. 

Maybe I'm wrong about the whole thing. 

therapydoc






Tuesday, July 22, 2008

BlogHer

One of the things about being out here on the Internet, for a person like me, is the fear.

I worry that if twenty, or a hundred, or a couple of thousand people or even more, read what I write, that the odds are pretty good that I'll upset someone. And this doesn't sit right with me, makes me want to pitch the whole thing.

An email conversation with a cousin (Let's call him Mike):

Mike: Great post on the family blog! I love the pictures.

Me: Oh, I didn't post them. E. did. But speaking of blogs, if anyone should write a blog, it would be you. I happen to know that you're a writer and as a rabbi, too, you
actually have something to say. Why don't you read this guy (I link him to a blogger rabbi).

Mike: I KNEW it would be dangerous contacting you!

See? He's scared, too.

Readers of this blog who email me about their problems usually get back a prefabricated answer, although I try to personalize it and will sometimes hypothetical-ize it.

I go into why I can't address personal problems on the blog or by email. I just don't want to get into trouble, you know. Sure, it's lame. No guts, no glory. But people need their own face time with a flesh and blood therapy doc, and that's basically what they hear from me.

Apologetically. I have an entire lecture about pat answers.

Speaking of apologies, validating comments is hard! And here I wrote that entire post about validating what people say. Ugh. I stay up night wondering, honestly, where people have gone. Sorry, sorry, sorry, guilty as always. Please forgive.

But here's another thing. I've never officially linked to BlogHer!

The Unstory

The other day, cruising the blogs, avoiding responsibility, I noticed someone had linked over to BlogHer. Now, two years ago, when I first started blogging, BlogHer was the first website out there that really helped women network with women. Empath Daught had told me how to find it. It was a dot.org at the time, not a dot.com.

Anyway, BlogHer linked back to me, as is her nature, many times, and I never properly thanked her (them, really), not even in the monthly Back 'acha posts.

Total ingratitude. Such an oversight. How these things happen, I don't know. A person gets momentum and sees forward, not back. Wasn't it Bob Dylan who said, Don't Look Back? Why would I listen to him?

But now, well, here's a chance to make up for it. I'm going to direct all of you there! To BlogHer! Even men! Especially men. Sure, why not? At the risk of losing you forever to the many amazing BlogHer bloggers, check them out.

And we'll get to my apologies for not answering email and not validating your comments,and on and on, another day.

Here are only a handful of the women to watch at BlogHer.

Mir Kamin chimes an objection to people who worry about men with cameras around children in bathing suits. Not everyone's a pervert, she's thinking. I'm glad. But what if just one. . .

Lisa Stone I think Lisa founded BlogHer. She's so accomplished she's scary. Reading her bio makes a person proud to be female, related by some speck of DNA.

Nordette Adams tells us about a police officer who lost it in the carpool line. You can read Nordette here. She'll tell you about septuagenarians (a theme, lately) having babies. So it's not all about raging, here.

You think that I talk too much about sex? Find Liz Rizzo at Everyday Goddess and sure, at BlogHer, too.

Just a start. So many more.

therapydoc

Transitions

   Rabbi Zev o nce  told us that a rabbi, a Jew, has to be ready to go to a funeral and then a wedding  on the same day, maybe within a few ...